i4dezign73 on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/i4dezign73/art/To-fake-or-not-to-fake-that-is-the-question-434914876i4dezign73

Deviation Actions

i4dezign73's avatar

To fake or not to fake, that is the question?

By
Published:
931 Views

Description

WARNING: If you are an amateur paint over artist, (Note I said amateur - if you are professional digital retouching artist who earns lots of money out of doing this stuff for a living properly, then I'll admit I am just jealous!) But to the rest, and those easily offended YOU MAY NOT WANT TO CONTINUE READING!


I deliberated lots over posting this. And given my usually placid nature regarding such matters, there will no doubt be a few who will gasp in horror at its content. But, of late, I admit I am quite astonished, if not somewhat offended by the amount of attention that is given to what is often deemed as Paint over Art. For whatever reason, it not only fools the viewer into thinking the artist is an amazing painter but also seems to get a ridiculous amount of praise and hundreds of views a day!

Now, firstly I should say...I am not disillusioned or living in the dark ages. In fact, I am the first person on the planet to embrace most forms of digital art. There are no rules and regulations. No one has written a rule book or created a bible telling you how to create your art. And I, as much as the next person, do often use the odd texture, the odd filter finish, colouring etc... And, yes there are many a good number of reasons some artists use photos directly in their work. Though, as I commented right at the beginning of this piece, these people are getting paid a decent amount of money for doing so by big corporate companies!  

So, my objection is largely about dishonesty. And in so many words, trying to convince folks you are something you are not!

Cue the Fake Portrait Artist...

People painting people, mainly celebs is nothing new. Folks have done it for years. But digital painting has, unfortunately, created a new breed of artist, especially in the amateur/hobby sector. And this is where we get the great divide between what's deemed clever and what's deemed downright bloody lazy! The worst kind IMO is the one-button fake technique artist, that will try to convince you they have painted a marvellous watercolour of their favourite pop star - YET...last week, they could barely draw a straight line!

So, have we just become a nation good at faking things?

So what I hear you cry? Women have faked orgasms for years! True, but much like good sex, painting a portrait, for me, is about painting with a clear conscience and an honest hand. It also equals greater satisfaction. And if done well, can lead to bigger things, (no sexual puns intended!) But surely, if you're serious about your work, then this should be a no-brainer?

However. If you are a dabbler, not too fussed HOW you create your work, or to what ends you go to do it, then perhaps you seem destined to only end up doing this kind of stuff either for nothing or just to make new friends with a few kids in fan communities. Sorry, that's blunt, but much like how it is.
 
SO, what have I posted?

I did this little piece just to prove my point. And aim it at those who, like me, enjoy painting TV/film celebrities. We all know Fan Art for years has been stuck in its own version of Fifty Shades of
Grey, and I am fully aware there is a whole other argument regarding how legit doing this stuff is. But, for the benefit of this post, let's leave that for a rainy day.

Firstly, I want to point something out THIS IS NOT HOW I PAINT MY OWN PORTRAITS - If you would like to see how I do mine I have links on my My Behance I have nothing to hide and explain how I do it.

BUT, I do want folks to see, just how easy it is to fool people. Course, I should say, the quality of paint over is only defined by the experience of the artist painting it. So tbh, if you've got an amateur artist who struggles to paint well, there's every chance their paint overs will look rushed and clumsy.

So, let me just explain what a paint over is. There are two ways of doing this.

1: The paint over the top paint over - This is usually a photograph placed on a background layer in Photoshop or Gimp or some other editing software. The picture remains in place throughout the whole painting process and using perhaps several new layer/s the user will then paint directly over the top of the photo, by using brushes available in Photoshop. (For quick reference, composition placement, it's not totally unheard of, but for the whole process, personally a bit overkill and lazy. Unless you are professional Italian Artist Gianfranco Gallo - that's a guy who really knows what he is doing!

***Cue rant:*** Telling folks you have painted every single brush stroke' kinda makes you look stupid! Every digital artist in the world paints a brushstroke, be it one or thousands! What do you want...a medal? It isn't a claim...it's a cop-out!

2: The let's just smudge, smooth and soften the original photo with a few filters paint over — Is an even bigger waste of time. But, sadly it fools folks and is more available commercially
more than one realises!


So, back to my post.


WHY am I not happy with it?

Well, I know I've faked it! Its finish is fairly acceptable. BUT it is NOT how I normally work, or how I would leave my work. Yet, I've made my point - it's a decent likeness, and with more work, could easily pass as a decent photorealistic representation. Remove the photo, and hey presto my first crack at paint-over art!

So, what's the point?
Personally, it doesn't make me proud because I know I've cheated for the purpose of creating this post.

It's just a screengrab. Available in the public domain. Which, in the end, I found myself getting more frustrated by and doing way more work on it than is necessary. But that's just how I work generally. I'm a perfectionist (not always a good thing) so I could've easily done the whole thing for several hours this way. But, I chose not to. Because tbh, I didn't want to spend hours on such a pointless project, when I get more satisfaction out of painting my own portraits my own way.

OK, so you may go away and think wowzers. NOW I can go away and cheat. So be it, do whatever pleases you...BUT, if you are selling your work to the public do you really feel good about painting your art this way? I know what some of you may still be thinking...yes it's the same as before. SO what...Right? WHAT does it matter, what is the difference between one person doing their art this way and another doing it the hard way. When all I care about is the finished product. I don't care how the artist created it — TBH, it doesn't matter if you don't have a conscience, but perhaps I do.

And sadly that is a statement most of us have to accept these days in the world of digital art! Because, often or not, it is virtually impossible to tell the fakes and the genuine artists apart anymore.
But, to me, I always feel that if you are not prepared to at least share some of your WIPs, or show stage paints, you have something to hide!

However, if you read this and don't feel the same, and it doesn't bother you how an artist goes about creating their work, (I mean why wouldn't you learn how to paint the hard way. It's great fun),
then I may need to rest my case.

If however, you like letting folks believe you have a talent as a great portrait artist when in fact, all you are doing is fooling them, making it twice as hard for those of us who do take the time and go to the
trouble of creating our paintings from scratch, then good luck to you.

Anyway, this is purely my opinion. But just take a moment and consider what you are viewing in future before you hit fave, and tell someone how bloody marvellous they are! Furthermore, check their gallery to see if they can actually draw. A whole gallery based on paint overs / or filtered art seems quite dull and a waste of time to me! No, I disagree! 


©i4dezign73 / ifourdezign. All rights reserved.
Image size
1025x771px 570.15 KB
© 2014 - 2024 i4dezign73
Comments0
Comments have been disabled for this deviation